Archive through August 30, 2003 Log Out | Topics | Search
Moderators | Register | Edit Profile

Express Builders Forum » General Express Aircraft Discussions » Landing Gear » Archive through August 30, 2003 « Previous Next »

Author Message
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Eric Holmberg
New member
Username: Erich

Post Number: 54
Registered: 05-2002
Posted on Monday, April 28, 2003 - 09:33 pm:   

Hmmmm, if someone knows how to change the image that I uploaded, please email me!

Until then, here's the factory image. grrr.

Correctly sized image

-Eric
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Jerry Sjostrand
New member
Username: Jerry

Post Number: 15
Registered: 08-1999
Posted on Monday, April 28, 2003 - 09:45 pm:   


For what it is worth, my secand nose gear leg was the thicker 3/16" and had the plate re-enforcement as shown in the factory picture. Upon impact it broke exactly at the end of the plate. The stub then made a groove in the pavement until it broke off at the "T" bar.

My first leg was re-enforced differently with a plate welded on top and was the thinner 1/8" tube and it bent into a "J" shape but never broke. Made a nice skid.

Cheers, Jerry


Which would you prefer?
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Eric Holmberg
New member
Username: Erich

Post Number: 55
Registered: 05-2002
Posted on Monday, April 28, 2003 - 09:56 pm:   

Personally, I'd prefer not doing either

So from that, would you say that I shouldn't worry about reinforcing my leg?

-Eric
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Jerry Sjostrand
New member
Username: Jerry

Post Number: 16
Registered: 08-1999
Posted on Monday, April 28, 2003 - 10:09 pm:   

Eric;
I think I would not change it 'cause if you "dunk it" it is going to bend or break anyway. Many Express' have had this problem. Some only bent a little--but it is still bent. It would be interesting to have a count of those that have had a problem with a "hard" landing incident. Hmmmm!
Cheers, Jerry

Good luck
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

jharlow
Unregistered guest
Posted on Tuesday, April 29, 2003 - 02:35 am:   

The factory leg does not have gussts, that is a solid piece of metal thru the leg that appears to be gussetts. The leg that failed on Bob Kaz's Auriga showed insufficient weld penetration.
FWIW
John
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Cyrus Ostowari
New member
Username: Ostowari

Post Number: 1
Registered: 05-2003
Posted on Monday, May 19, 2003 - 01:57 am:   

Dear Builders,
I have started to build my CT after many years of storage.
I am in desparate need of information on the landing gear brackets that fit on Rib R. My shipment was missing these parts. I contacted Mr. Olsen, but he wants to sell me a new set of aluminium landing gears and the new brackets. I would like some one out there to provide some information on these brackets as I could make them myself. For example a photograph, drawing of brackets and material used ande the mounting method for the gear.
Thanka
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Anonymous
Posted on Monday, May 19, 2003 - 05:49 am:   

Cyrus,

There is a very good reason Larry Olson wants you to use the new landing gear and brackets. That is because they are an improvement from the older design. If I were you, I would take his advice. I think you will be money ahead in the long run if you do.

Jim Butler
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Brynjar Thordarson
New member
Username: Benny

Post Number: 21
Registered: 10-2000
Posted on Saturday, August 30, 2003 - 12:37 am:   

I need information that I can't find in any manual. How much does the new aluminium gear bend from "off the ground" to aircraft sitting on it's wheels? I know that with average empty weight to max weight it bends about 1°. With all the brackets in place and the wing upside down in the jig I get 10° difference from the axle to the lower spar cap. I find that a bit much and wonder if the gear really bends that much after the aircraft is assembled and sitting on the ground. Who has these measurements, please? I think this is an important thing to know as it's not easy to do this by trial and error.
Best rgds and happy building.
BENNY
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

wayne norris
New member
Username: Wayne_norris

Post Number: 10
Registered: 02-2003
Posted on Saturday, August 30, 2003 - 08:40 am:   

I would say there is atleast a 10 degree diff from the spar,but don't for get about the diheadral. At the skin opening the gear doesn't move that much so the opening can be farley tight. 1/4" gap. Bottom line is that all these planes are alittle different, so you will have to trim/shim your axle to get the proper toe in/camber. and then it will change after the first few landing. This is not something that you will set and forget in one afternoon. I didn't use shims, I milled off the face of my axles to fit. Have fun.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Ted Gaston
Unregistered guest
Posted on Saturday, August 30, 2003 - 04:12 pm:   

Bennie, With the airplane jacked up and level, set your gear for +88 degrees of camber. That's 2 degrees past plumb at the face where the axle bolts to the gear leg. When you set the airplane down on the gear after that, use a skid plate under each tire (2 pieces of aluminum approximatly 12x12 inches with grease between them). You should see about +89.5 degrees at the brake disk with no fuel on board. The leg will flex approximatly another 1 degree past plumb to -89.5 degrees when you fuel up. The legs seem to be consistant so far on all the one we have installed here. You may e-mail or call if you need further assistance.